Local Control vs. Victoria: Abbott Street Heritage Area Gets a Second Chance Under a New Government |
Kelowna City Council asked Victoria in June to remove the Abbott Street Heritage Conservation Area from the Kelowna General Hospital Transit-Oriented Area; with a new Conservative government promising to return density decisions to municipalities, that request may finally get a hearing, though repeal of Bill 47 itself is not yet confirmed |
Listen to this story:
The quick read: Kelowna City Council asked Victoria in June to remove the Abbott Street Heritage Conservation Area from the Kelowna General Hospital Transit-Oriented Area, where provincial rules allow buildings of up to six storeys. With a new Conservative government promising to return density decisions to local governments, that request may finally get a hearing. But repeal of Bill 47 itself is not yet a confirmed government commitment, only an expectation reported in political commentary.
For years, Kelowna residents around Abbott Street have lived with a planning contradiction imposed from Victoria.
On one hand, the Abbott Street Heritage Conservation Area has held formal heritage status since 1998, protecting a neighbourhood defined by its historic homes, mature landscaping, tree canopy and streetscape. On the other, the Province designated a Transit-Oriented Area around the Kelowna General Hospital bus exchange that overlaps the heritage area, and under the rules tied to Bill 47, land in the outer tier of that area must generally be permitted to accommodate residential buildings of up to six storeys and a floor area ratio of 2.5.
Council already asked. Victoria never answered.
Kelowna City Council did not sit on the problem. On June 15, 2026, Council adopted a resolution requesting that the Province remove the Abbott Street Heritage Conservation Area from the hospital Transit-Oriented Area. On June 30, Mayor Tom Dyas wrote to provincial ministers on Council's behalf, describing the overlap as creating policy uncertainty and tension between heritage preservation and future growth.
Council's request was not a rejection of housing growth across the city. It identified one specific conflict, in one established heritage neighbourhood, and asked the Province to fix it.
A new government, a new opening
Following the October 24, 2026 provincial election, incoming Premier Lorne Doerkson and the B.C. Conservatives have signalled their intention to reverse elements of the previous NDP government's provincially mandated housing legislation. The party's 2026 election platform pledged to give local governments a say in deciding where density goes, holding municipalities to locally developed Official Community Plans with appropriate density targets rather than determining all density requirements centrally.
In an October 30 column for the Vancouver Sun, political columnist Vaughn Palmer wrote that the Conservatives are expected to repeal both Bill 44 and Bill 47, and perhaps other measures as well. That is an expectation reported in political commentary, not a confirmed government commitment to repeal Bill 47, and residents should keep that distinction in mind.
Still, the direction is encouraging for anyone who believes decisions about a neighbourhood's character belong closer to home than in Victoria. A November 2 Vancouver Sun report found B.C. mayors largely supportive of restoring local decision-making authority, and in December 2025, 16 Metro Vancouver mayors had already called for the Province to reconsider major elements of its housing legislation, including Bill 47 and Transit-Oriented Areas.
The common-sense middle ground
There may be no need to scrap the whole framework to solve Kelowna's problem. Section 585.51(c) of B.C.'s Local Government Act already authorizes Cabinet to make regulations providing exemptions from the Transit-Oriented Area density restrictions. A narrowly defined exemption for established Heritage Conservation Areas could resolve conflicts like Abbott Street's while leaving the wider framework in place where higher-density development near transit is appropriate.
That is the question now before the incoming government: will its promise of local control extend to a neighbourhood that did everything right, asked politely, and waited? Kelowna's heritage residents, and its council, deserve an answer.
Sources: Kelowna Heritage Conservation Area analysis of Bill 47 and the Abbott Street overlap, November 2026; Vancouver Sun columns and reporting, October 30 and November 2, 2026; Conservative Party of British Columbia 2026 election platform; City of Kelowna Council resolution, June 15, 2026. |

0 Comments
Join the conversation
Be the first to comment
Share your thoughts above.