Déjà Vu in Kelowna Centre: A Judge Will Decide the Seat Again as Judicial Recount Is Ordered |
Kristina Loewen leads Loyal Wooldridge by 43 votes — 11,689 to 11,646 — a margin under 0.2 per cent that triggers an automatic judicial recount, the second time in a row these two have gone to a judge |
Listen to this story:
The quick read: Kelowna Centre is going to a judge — again. Conservative Kristina Loewen leads the NDP's Loyal Wooldridge by just 43 votes, 11,689 to 11,646, a margin under 0.2 per cent that automatically triggers a judicial recount under B.C. election law. The recount must take place 7 to 15 days after the official results are declared on November 10. It is the second election in a row these two candidates have ended up in a recount: in 2024 Loewen won by 40 votes, and the recount changed nothing.
Here we go again.
Kelowna Centre is heading to a judicial recount for the second election in a row, and the winner of the seat will once again be decided by a judge.
Forty-three votes
Elections BC's final count has Conservative Kristina Loewen at 11,689 votes and the BC NDP's Loyal Wooldridge at 11,646.
The gap is 43 votes out of 24,272 valid ballots.
Under B.C. election law, when the margin is less than 0.2 per cent, or one in 500 ballots, the Supreme Court has to recount the vote.
This one qualifies, so the recount is automatic.
No candidate has to ask for it.
Once the final count was done, the District Electoral Officer had to apply for the judicial recount and notify both candidates.
What happens next
The recount has to take place between seven and 15 days after the official election results are declared on November 10.
A Supreme Court justice decides how to run it: by hand, with a tabulator machine, or both.
The justice can hold it in court chambers, at the electoral office, or anywhere else they decide.
Elections BC has not shared the details of how this recount will happen, including the date or the location.
The district electoral officer, the chief electoral officer, the candidates and a scrutineer for each candidate are all entitled to be there.
The justice can allow anyone else to attend, and can bring in help to do the counting.
Ballots can be challenged on validity, and after the recount either candidate may appeal to the Court of Appeal.
If no one appeals, the results go back to the district electoral officer and are certified.
It happened before, two years ago
This is familiar ground for both candidates.
In 2024, Loewen won Kelowna Centre by just 40 votes, and the seat went to a judicial recount then too.
Justice Allison Beames handled that recount, and it did not change the result.
Loewen said on social media after the final count that she is confident the same will hold this time.
Wooldridge said he has full confidence in the electoral system and its workers, and sees the recount as confirming the results rather than questioning them.
He added that all parties and candidates have been invited to bring scrutineers to oversee the process, and he has no concerns about transparency.
Why the process matters
A judicial recount is not a sign that something went wrong.
It is the system working the way it was designed to work when a race is this close.
As the judge in the 2024 Surrey-Guildford recount put it, the point is a transparent, impartial and reviewable count that gives the public confidence in the result.
In that 2024 recount, officials found 28 votes Elections BC had missed in the final count, and the outcome was still the same.
Kelowna Centre voters will know their MLA once the judge has counted, and not before.
Forty-three votes is a rounding error in most elections.
In this one, it is the whole ballgame.
Sources: iNFOnews.ca, Jesse Tomas, November 9, 2026; Elections BC final count figures via BC Ballot, checked November 9, 2026; Castanet, November 9, 2026. |

0 Comments
Join the conversation
Be the first to comment
Share your thoughts above.